2016-06-21

Jun 21 - 27. GG #14, BCR #63, BOS #9

Summer, week 1

Chants for Jun 21 - 27 (from Boundless Way Zen Sutra Book. See: BoWZ Westchester Chant Schedule)
  • Shorter Precepts Recitation, p. 47
  • Heart Sutra, p. 12
Saturday Zen Service, Jun 25, 10:00 - 11:45am.
Room 24, Community UU
468 Rosedale Ave, White Plains, NY


This week's reading: "Love" from Charlotte Joko Beck, Everyday Zen. p. 71. (To order from Amazon CLICK HERE)

This week's case: "Nanquan Kills the Cat," Gateless Gate, #14; Blue Cliff Record, #63-64; Book of Serenity, #9
NOTE: Gateless Gate #14 and Book of Serenity #9 are the same. The case also appears in the Blue Cliff Record, but divided into two parts. The first half of the case is BCR #63, and the second half of the case is BCR #64. This week, we focus on the first half. Next week's case will be the same, but with focus on the second half.

Personnel
Nanquan (748 - 835, 9th generation) was a disciple of Mazu, founder of the Hongzhou school. His most famous pupil was Zhaozhou (778 - 897, 10th generation).

Case
Once the monks of the eastern and western Zen halls in Master Nanquan's temple were quarrelling about a cat.
Nanquan held up the cat and said, “You monks! If one of you can say a word, I will spare the cat. If you can't say anything, I will put it to the sword.”
No one could answer, so Nanquan finally slew it.
In the evening when Zhaozhou returned, Nanquan told him what had happened.
Zhaozhou thereupon took off his sandals, put them on his head, and walked off.
Nanquan said, “If you had been there, I could have spared the cat.”

Yuanwu's Preface
When the roads of thought go no further, here is truly good teaching. When words and letters do not reach it, you should quickly fasten your eye upon it. If lighting should dart and stars fly by, you will overturn the ocean and knock down the mountains. Is there anyone in the assembly who can say it? To test, I cite this. Look!

Xuedou's Verse (Sekida translation)
Thoughtless the monks of both halls;
Raising dust and smoke,
Out of control.
Fortunately, Nanquan was there;
His deeds squared with his words.
He cut the cat in two
Regardless of who was right,
Who wrong.

Xuedou's Verse (Cleary translation)
The residents of both halls were incompetent Zennists;
Stirring up smoke and dust, they were helpless to cope.
Luckily they had Nanquan there who could uphold order,
One knife cutting in two pieces, no matter if lopsided.

Hongzhi's Verse (Wick translation)
All monks of both halls were arguing.
Old Teacher King could put right and wrong to the test.
By his sharp knife cutting, the shapes were both forgotten.
A thousand ages love an adept man.
The Way is still not overthrown.

Hongzhi's Verse (Cleary translation)
The monks of both halls were all arguing;
Old Teacher Nanquan was able to show up true and false.
Cutting through with a sharp knife, all oblivious of formalities,
For a thousand ages he makes people admire an adept.
This path has not perished.

Sekida's Comment (on the first half)
How will you answer? Can you say, "Don't worry, the cat is already cut in tow; there is no need to use the knife; give it to me"? What is the cat? It is your own ego. If you get rid of your ego's demands, there is no dread, no anger, no fear of death. "Cut the cat in two" implies a decisive, determined action. Nanquan was indifferent to who was right, who wrong, and indifferent to all possible criticism. Nanquan is always in samadhi. When killing, he is really killing; when releasing, he is really releasing. However, at the last moment he must have put down the cat.

Dogen's Comment (cited in Sekida)
If I were Nanquan I should say, "If you answer, I will kill it; if you don't answer, I will kill it." If I were the monks, I should say, "We cannot answer; please cut the cat in two." Or I should say, "The master knows how to cut it into two pieces, but he does not know how to cut it into one piece." If I were Nanquan and the monks could find no answer, I should say, "You could not answer," and put down the cat.

Daito Kokushi's Verse (cited in Yamada)
Holding up the cat, one, two, three!
If you cut it, there is the iron hammer with no hole.

Tenkei's Verse (cited in Yamada)
A clean cut, and there’s the cat’s skin running away.

Yamada's Comment (on the first half)
The monks from the east and west sectors had gathered together one day and were in a heated argument. There has been much speculation from times of old as to what they were arguing about. Yasutani sees them as concerned with the most basic question of Buddhism, namely, “does a cat have a Buddha-nature?” Nanquan, evidently observing all this from afar, must have been muttering under his breath about “these good-for-nothing monks.” The case presents us with two problems. First, what is the cat after all? Second, did Nanquan actually cut the cat in two? Harada takes the cat to be all the collected junk in our own heads, all the thoughts and wonderings about whether a cat has Buddha nature and the like. Thus, Nanquan is cutting through all those concepts and presenting the truth. Yasutani agrees that the cat is conceptual thought, but sees Nanquan as cutting off the root of all those concepts. According to Yasutani, Nanquan did not actually cut the cat in two. He might have held the cat before the monks and looked like he was going to kill it. But he merely made a gesture of slashing with the knife and then let the cat go. If Nanquan actually killed the cat he would be guilty of breaking one of the Buddhist precepts. These various interpretations are attempts to take the blame away from Nanquan for his action. Iida Tôin says, “Do you think there is time here to talk nonsense about breaking precepts?” This is yet another way of viewing the koan. From the essential standpoint there is no death. If the idea that there can be killing should flash even momentarily through our heads, we have already broken the precept. Nanquan did what he did out of his feeling of compassion for the monks, wishing to somehow rid them of their delusions. His purpose was not killing the cat. But I prefer to see the action of holding up the cat as presenting essential nature. That very action of holding up the cat is essential nature itself. By cutting the cat in two, Nanquan has deprived the monks of all their cherished notions and concepts about Buddha-nature.

Daido's Comment
In the resolution of conflict, one can turn to council, the law, or the dharma. Council and law are dependent upon the power of others, the dharma is based on one's own natural powers of equanimity. Nanquan does not turn to forgiveness, encouragement, reprimand, or chastisement. He simply holds up the whole community at the edge of his diamond sword. This koan is not about killing or not killing but, rather, about transformation. An ancient sage said, "When you find yourself at an impasse, change; when you change, then you will easily pass through." No one in the assembly can see past the thickness of their own skin.

Shishin Wick's Comment
Master Nanquan, with his fearless challenge of life and death, is trying to bring his disciples to the reality of the moment. Nanquan is begging his disciples to say one word to save the cat -- but they're paralyzed, dumbfounded. As long as there's a trace of self-grasping ignorance, you would not be able to do it. Hundreds and thousands of animals are killed every day, but none of these deaths is a sacrifice for our liberation. Nanquan sacrificed the life of one cat for the liberation of hundreds of millions of beings. He also was willing to sacrifice himself and accept whatever karma might have come from that act.

Rothenberg's Verse
The Famous Dead Cat
Holding up the mewling beast:
Speak, or it will die!
When you can't explain, then you must cry.
Where you can't speak, there you must look.
The right word would have saved the cat.
That time no one really died.
At an impasse -- revolution;
changed, you pass through.
No one spoke up, they were either
too quick, or not quick enough.
The creature held up,
reason sliced in two.
The kitten run over on the line in the road.
A casualty, an answer, a tear.

Hotetsu's Verse
What cruel murders do you commit
With your concept-clinging arguments?
Cut it in two. Cut it in one.
Present your delusions. Present essential nature.

No comments:

Post a Comment