These dualisms are necessary. They are also false. The challenge is to use them while also seeing through them.
Owl came to Raven for a private meeting and asked, "Is there something pure and clear underneath everything?"Verse
Raven said, "You can say that."
Owl said, "Isn't it a dualistic idea? I thought Buddhism is a religion of oneness.":
Raven croaked and then said, "Show me your essential purity and clarity."
Owl said, "I was just asking a question about Buddhism."
Raven said, "Don't neglect your religion of oneness."
First comes inferring what must be underneath.
Or believing what somebody else inferred.
And maybe that's enough,
And maybe not. Maybe you want to see it more directly --
Though what "directly" is, or "see," you don't know.
Legends say that once you see it
You'll see it's not underneath,
but immediately presents.
You never were looking at anything else,
Case adapted from Robert Aitken; introduction and verse by Meredith GarmonPREVIOUS ☙ NEXT ☙ INDEX